Rant: "Great Life Mysteries Solved, Part 1".

by Jigglesbig

in Completed Works

Rant: "Great Life Mysteries Solved, Part 1".

Great Life Mysteries Solved, Part 1:

"Edward And The Mystery Of The Falling Tree In The Woods":

If anyone ever asks the question "If a tree falls in the woods, and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?" ever again when I'm around, I'm going to construct a time machine, then travel through time, find out who came up with the question, then Sparta-kick them into a giant hole in the ground. The question is annoyingly stupid, and if you have to think about the answer for more than 10 seconds, then you're stupid as well, especially if you can't come up with the right answer. In fact, 10 seconds is too long, it should be a quick answer of something in the affirmative, preferably with an insult attached to make them feel as dumb or bad as you want to. Try something along the lines of "Of course it does, what are you, a woman? Go make me a sandwich". Of course, you might want to change it if you don't want to offend other people around you, but the whole point is offending them, or being right, whatever.

I hate this question because its so goddamn stupid. Have you ever heard a tree fall? Chances are, you probably have, and if you haven't, it doesn't really matter. When something falls down, it makes a noise. The movement of the object, especially in reference to making contact with a solid surface, or colliding with another object, in this case, the ground, will cause not only a physical impact, but an audible impact as well. For example, clapping your hands causes a noise, and its known that it does. When a tree falls over, it makes a sound, and when its in the woods, its going to make a sound. Thats pretty much a given. So why are some people so stupid as to think that as soon as theres no one around to hear it, its not going to happen? If a bomb goes off, and no one is around to be caught in it, does it still make a loud noise when it explodes, as well as cause a large amount of collateral damage? Of course it does. If anything occurred, just because no one is around to witness it, it doesn't mean it doesn't happen, or doesn't make a noise. The only way it wouldn't make a noise was if it was in space, or a vacuum. But theres a problem with that, which is, apart from the fact that the tree would die instantly in space, but that it technically couldn't fall over in space, it would just float, is the fact that the question claims the tree falls in the woods, but in the vast outreaches of space, so that kind of annuls that argument, which is annoying, because I thought about that argument. Also, you want me to prove I'm right, put recording equipment in some woods where a tree is going to fall soon, then listen to the recording as it falls, and it'll prove I'm right. It may not be the best of tests, but at least I have a way of backing up my argument. Which brings me neatly onto my tangent.

One thing that really does annoy me about the argument, apart from the fact that the damn tree will make a sound if it falls in the woods, regardless of no one being around to witness it, is the fact that whenever you're with a group of people, for example, a Theory Of Knowledge class, you'll always get at least one person who disagrees with you. i mean, I appreciate the idea of free thought, and so on, but I hate the fact that every time, no matter what, there'll always be one person who disagrees with you, no matter the argument, no matter what. The stupid thing is, you know they're stupid, because they don't even give a real answer as to why. They normally say "You're wrong", and when pressed for reasons why, they just respond "it just is". I have a simple request for those people: Never have children. I also have a more serious request: If you disagree, but don't have any real arguments to back up your answer, then just don't speak up. Its good that you have your own opinion, but no one will respect you if you don't give good arguments to back up your opinion. And finally, if someone gives an answer to the tree falling question that somehow implicates God, or a religious deity, please don't. While according to your faith, God is everywhere, saying that causes a paradoxical answer, as saying that means someone would be there to witness it, thus not answering the question, and negating it.

In conclusion, I hate the question "If a tree falls in the woods, and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?". It does make a sound! Stop thinking otherwise, please, because you're giving me more and more reasons to hate humanity as we know it.
I hate Theory of Knowledge.

Description

Dec 13th 2007
Tags:
great human nature humor journal life mysteries mystery narrative nature philosophical rant satirical society surreal youth
Views:
86
Comments:
7
Score:
5
Favorites:
2
DO NOT DOWNVOTE WITHOUT GIVING PROPER CRITICISM OR REASONS WHY.

This is my 3 Year Sheezyversary Submission.

Admittedly, its not the best thing I could have submitted, but I realised, I really like this one, and if I submit this one, it means I can submit other ones like it later on. Hence, why its called Part One, because I'd like to do more, except perhaps more in the style of Parody, rather than in rant form. Or, in both, which would be cool.

If you get offended by anything in this submission, don't be. Or, try not to be. Its not meant to offend, except in a humorous capacity.
Also, for those who don't understand what "Theory Of Knowledge" is, its a compulsory subject I have to take for the International Baccalaureate. And Its like Philosophy, but you look at knowledge and thought, instead of what you learn in Philosophy, which I assume is to do with other things like the soul, and life.

Anyway, I hope everyone enjoys the submission, and if not, reasons why, and constructive criticism. Or a combination of these, as well. I'd like that too.

But yeah, Happy 3rd Sheezyversary to me, and hope everyone enjoys my submission =D

Jigglesbig.

Comments

vedicardi Says:

needs a tl;dr

ZiggyBuggy Says:

You mong.

dfBlaze Says:

haha, such a stupid question. I lol everytime. There's a lot of obvious reasons as to why it does make a sound, but anyway, nicely put. In the second paragraph you kinda lost it and went a bit off and a little crazy I may add, but nice rant as usual.

Allaeriel Says:

So if a tree is in the vaccum of space and it 'falls' towards a black hole, it will not make a sound, but due to the dilation of time, will anyone be able to notice it before it's been crushed into oblivion?

Byte Says:

"Of course it does, what are you, a woman? Go make me a sandwich".

Epic win.

Rubbercookie Says:

If a woman is in a kitchen and no man is around, will she make a sandwich?

...

Anyways, the question was asked by some philosopher questioning wether anything needs to be before it's discovered.
The basic thougt is that if there is some point in space where noone will ever be or observe if something happens somewhere without any observable impact, the existence of that point is pointless and not even necessarily a fact.
The question in itself is very anti-deity. Definately not very religious in nature.
It roots down to "Am I?"
Only if the answer is yes, our logic ("course it does, maik me sandwich naow") succeeds...

Oh, and if you record the sound, you'll observe the impact of the falling tree (listening to the recording) and thus the existence of the sound of the fall makes sense.

...

The voting system. You don't seem to really grasp it.
Voting you up will rank you higher up on a list based on popularity.
The voting up/down therefore is decided by opinion, not fact, and that's why people may vote something up if they like it or down if they don't, regardless of having commented or having a more "real reason" than "It is so; I don't like it/I like it."

Prototype Says:

I believe you're interpreting the question incorrectly. Now, before I continue, I should note that I do take your side on the matter. That being said, I do think the though on the subject isn't bad. The question has absolutely nothing to do with the tree, of course. The real question is how do you prove existence? How do you know there's anything behind you when you don't see it, other than the fact that you can turn around? How do you prove that the world didn't appear from nowhere 10 minutes ago, other than the fact that you have memory, which could also have been created 10 minutes ago? Of course the most logical answer, is that it didn't just appear 10 minutes ago, that everything we know from experience is true. But, one should never exclude room for the "What if?"

Also, for the direct answer to the tree falling in the woods question, conservation of energy says so, as you could trace the transfer of energy back should you want to, if you have such ungodly amount of time to do so.